Camp Crooked Creek, Lincoln Hertiage Council Louisville KY
Climbing merit badge is offerred only thru the tower program must be 13 years old by Jan. 2007 before taking.
I emailed that one.
The only bummer is that it means the boy that turned 13 January 2nd has to wait till he is 14. I guess they had to pick some date. My son (born March 25th) will also have to wait till the summer after he turns 13 to do the Tower.
We need more age restrictions, not less.
Not sure I totally agree with this. I am fine with age restrictions for saftey reasons but not just for the sake of restrictions. If that makes sense. The truth is there are lots of age restrictions that we have to deal with in life, most of them are to protect us and we have to accept them.
You can't get a license till you are 16 (here in Indiana they have actually made it really weird but I think if you don't take Driver's Ed it is 16 and 6 months.)
You can't drink until you turn 21.
You can't vote till you are 18.
I know some would point out that these don't apply to scouting so let's look at some that do.
You can't work on merit bages or rank after you turn 18.
You can't join Boy Scouts till you are at least 10. You have to earn your AOL to join before 11. You have to be 14 (and have completed the 8th grade) to become part of a venturing crew.
Aren't these age restrictions? If the restriction is in climb on safely, then it should be followed. It is not really adding on. Would you want to risk that a boy that starts a climbing Merit badge when he crossed over at 10 1/2 or even 11, is going to remeber what he learned when he goes to be a Belayer at age 13?
However the flip side of that is, if we just make age restrictions to keep boys in the program I am not sure it will have that much effect. There are plenty of oppertunites for older scouts now that the younger ones don't have. The problem isn't that they have nothing to look forward to, it is that the things they have to look forward to don't grab their attention as much as the fumes do. I personally think that is one of the reasons why when there is no safety issue involved that boys should get a taste for things. That alone helps keep them excited. My son is looking forward to a 50 miler canoe trip this summer. He went rapelling and loved it and is excited to turn 13 and get to work on his climbing merit badge.
My nephew on the other hand was in a troop where they didn't allow the younger boys to do these things. They "saved them for the older boys". You know what happened he was tired of watching the older boys do all the fun stuff and dropped out. He was especially frusterated when he came for a visit and heard all the "cool" stuff my son was getting to do. Now that he has moved here to live with his dad, my son wants him to give scouting a try again.
Now maybe my nephew would have still dropped out even if he did get to do the "cool" stuff, we will never know. I just am not sure that saving the cool stuff retains boys any better then letting them experince. I would propose that it is proably about equal. You lose boys to having "been there done that" and you lose boys to the "I don't want to watch the other boys do all the fun stuff."
Just my 2 cents.
Jennifer