Moderators: Site Admin, Moderators
We all try to look at the application of Scouting's Aims in a practical fashion. We keep asking how can we meet the needs of the boys while still adhering to the Spirit of Scouting. He and CC also designated that we can do SMCs for other ranks in his absence as long as the boy asks one week in advance (so we can prepare).smtroop168 wrote:Glad to see this SM was thinking ahead.
ThunderingWind wrote:We all try to look at the application of Scouting's Aims in a practical fashion. We keep asking how can we meet the needs of the boys while still adhering to the Spirit of Scouting. He and CC also designated that we can do SMCs for other ranks in his absence as long as the boy asks one week in advance (so we can prepare).smtroop168 wrote:Glad to see this SM was thinking ahead.
smtroop168 wrote:Why do you need a week to prepare for a SMC?
Since we are not meeting officially as a Troop, these other Scouts may not be attending the Patrol meetings of the New Scout patrols. So they must call one of us and then we Adults have time to prepare, make sure we have Committee Members to do the BOR and also so we are sure we have two deep leadership.Nuts4Scouts wrote:smtroop168 wrote:Why do you need a week to prepare for a SMC?
I was wondering the same thing !
ThunderingWind wrote:Since we are not meeting officially as a Troop, these other Scouts may not be attending the Patrol meetings of the New Scout patrols. So they must call one of us and then we Adults have time to prepare, make sure we have Committee Members to do the BOR and also so we are sure we have two deep leadership.Nuts4Scouts wrote:smtroop168 wrote:Why do you need a week to prepare for a SMC?
I was wondering the same thing !
Besides I want to learn the questions and practice so I come off more prepared than just reading the a list of questions. I have seen too many BORs that were not personal enough (at least for me). Same with the few Eagle Boards I have reviewed.
smtroop168 wrote:I thought you were referring to SMCs not BORs. You don't need 2 deep leadership for SMCs.
ThunderingWind wrote:smtroop168 wrote:I thought you were referring to SMCs not BORs. You don't need 2 deep leadership for SMCs.
Yes, I do mean the SMCs then followed up by the the BORs. Again, since we are not meeting regularly during the summer, we will not have people
around to be YP Safe during these unique SMCs. So we are creating a YP Safe environment to do both the SMC and BOR as needed.
smtroop168 wrote:Okay..it looked like you switched gears on us as the original post had nothing about BORs mentioned.
ThunderingWind wrote:smtroop168 wrote:Okay..it looked like you switched gears on us as the original post had nothing about BORs mentioned.
Sorry. The mind is quicker than the fingers.
Yes, I want to be better prepared to do my part at the SMC. The week is just so the adults have time to make sure we provide a YP Safe environment for our
Scouts.
smtroop168 wrote:You don't need 2 deep leadership for SMCs.
RWSmith wrote:(*) The CC has the authority to act as SM, in his/her absence. But, back to the scope of this thread, it is almost always better for the ASM(s) to conduct SMCs in lieu of the SM; and, as long as the SM delegates (not the CC* or COR) that authority to a specific ASM (or, more), then it's completely legit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests