9009scoutmaster wrote:I have to say NO (...)
I have been reading all the old posts Little by little ,as time allows me, and what surprises me the most especially because ,YES, I am an outsider, ( I've experience scouting in a different Country) is the Venturer or Venturing controversial.
I read posts where some of you asked why do they, the venturers want to belong to BSA, and other comments making clear that Venturing is not welcome or understood , or accepted, and/or all of the above.
I know that sometimes a writing comment can ''sound" condescending, or rude, but BELIEVE me, I am not trying to be neither. What I want is to learn more about the BSA, My oldest kid has been in the program for over 8 years, but I only started to get involved 3 years ago, when I realized that the B in BSA stands for NO GIRLS ALLOWED
Anyway back to the point.
I have been reading a lot of Scouting information specially about the World Scout Conference,where they discuss the best way to keep scouting alive and true to the ideals of the Founder and from what I understood, Venturing was created by the BSA, (so its not like they want to belong ,) THEY DO BELONG.
Another thing that I understood about Venturing was that it was created to introduce coed to BSA without drooping the B, or ruffling a lot of (traditional)feathers.That's why it does not matter if the Venturers go climbing walls, or go to the theater, as long as the co-ed element exists.
A lot of people say "well girl scouts will never allow boys...."

The difference is that the G.S. aren't members of the WOSM so when the WOSM decides that scouting should ,at least try ,to be co-ed in every Country,the GS don't have to follow it, but the BSA does, because YES, the BSA is a member and bound to certain rules and regulations
Also, I read on the boards that Venturers are more relaxed as far as advancements goes?
That's the way scouting is done in Europe. A European scout can earn advancements like the ones the BSA has, but the emphasis is more on service to others. Almost every camping trip is tied with a community service to the town or a group of people, and scouts are also very visible (but I am off the subject again)
My point is ;maybe BSA is trying to be more
universal and at the same time, attract kids that would/could never join the BSA before.
Now if you look at the Venturers the way I see them, do you guys really think it matter if they are organized differently, or if they are older, or if they are girls and boys together?, or if they are not BSA?

They are Scouts.American Scouts and part of the BSA
Every 4 years the organizers of the World Scout Jamboree , (and lets not forget that the USA had a WSJ, so they know how to do it) unites Scouts of all Nations and sexes, and the BSA can't accommodate equally the Venturers and Boy Scots for a National event?
I just can't find any excuse good enough for the Venturers to be excluded from the National Jamboree (I know they can still go) , and, I am sure its difficult for the kids that attended the World Jamboree where unity, brotherhood,and tolerance was the word of the day, to realize that those values will be absent at the National .
OK, I am done ranting.
Sorry if I offended anybody