Moderators: Site Admin, Moderators
wagionvigil wrote:If he has a uniform. Not having a uniform cannot be held aganist him.
MisterChris wrote:wagionvigil wrote:If he has a uniform. Not having a uniform cannot be held aganist him.
Sure it can. Owning a uniform is part of the joining process in most troops. The parents are required to procure a uniform and book for the scout. Those parents that need help ask for and get it. We have men in our Troop and Church that will sponsor a scout to get him in uniform.
BOR is not a requirement for Scout, just Tenderfoot up. The Scout has 30 days (or more) to get his uniform. Troops also have uniform banks to help out with this situation.
There are troops in our area that do not mandate the full dress uniform, just jeans, sneaks, scout shirt, belt, and neckerchief.
Whatever the uniform is, it is the Scouts (and parents') responsibility to get him into it. It is the Troop's honor and priviledge to help in that. But it certainly can be a req for the BOR.
what is so wrong with this? can anyone give me an official reference for the info posted?
[/quote]A board can expect a Scout to be neat in appearance and properly uniformed.
A board can expect a Scout to be neat in appearance and properly uniformed.
Scouting179 wrote:I don't have a problem with BORs requiring a uniform, but I do have a problem with the "retesting", which is explicitly proscribed by the Advancement Guide.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests