by ilduncans » Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:32 pm
It's an interesting question ... if relatively unimportant. The answer certainly has to have some context around it.
There are some contexts for which Eagle Palms are considered a rank. As a district advancement chairman above alludes to, for the purposes of units reporting advancement to the council, as well as for reports on advancement in the district or council as a whole. It is similar for the now outdated quality unit criteria for percent of youth advancing in rank within a given year. For these three separate contexts, (and there are undoubtedly more) Eagle Palms are considered a rank.
For the youth perspective with regard to the requirements for a Scoutmaster conference and a Board of Review, Eagle Palms are treated as only rank advancements are, so the answer is, at best, ambiguous.
As in many postings above, however, there are other contexts in which Palms are absolutely -not- a rank. When one becomes a Star Scout, one ceases to be a First Class Scout, but when one earns a Bronze Palm, one certainly does -not- cease to be an Eagle Scout. Ranks are (generally) identified by oval patches, (Eagle medal notwithstanding), but not so with Palms.
So what's the bottom line? The bottom line is that this is an excellent question to start a kafuffle with, opening the door for a prolonged philosophical debate on what it is about a rank that makes it a rank – (perhaps an oval-shaped patch isn’t it), and can there really be more than one answer to a yes-or-no question.
As it stands, both answers are right, given the appropriate context, and similarly, both answers are wrong.