Moderators: Site Admin, Moderators
hacimsaalk wrote:i am kinda with evmori. the committee meetings SHOULD be open to any parent that wishes to attend.
hacimsaalk wrote:i feel that a "representative" of the scouts should be at EVERY meeting. it just helps communications and understanding between the 2 groups![]()
ASM-142 wrote:hacimsaalk wrote:i am kinda with evmori. the committee meetings SHOULD be open to any parent that wishes to attend.
If a parent wants to attend committee meetings then they should sign up to be a committee member. This way there is a background check on them before they are exposed to scout information.hacimsaalk wrote:i feel that a "representative" of the scouts should be at EVERY meeting. it just helps communications and understanding between the 2 groups![]()
There are items discussed in committee meetings that a scout should not be hearing even if they are good at keeping a secret.
It may be possible to have a committee meeting that is split into two components with a public session and a closed session similar to how some towns hold meetings.
Mrw wrote:Some personnel issues are handled by town or school councils in closed session and that is for the protection of the individual employees private matters.
The same would be true for a scout troop. If a parent had confidentially come to the committee and needed help with summer camp money because of some personal family issue - such as a job loss that they didn't want bandied about by the kids who might tease or make the son feel badly about - that should be handled by the committee without the scouts hearing about it.
I would have no problem having the SPL present for most committee discussions, but there also should not be a problem if the SPL is asked to sit outside for these types of personnel discussions either.
I have heard some things said at this type of closed committee discussion that clearly should not be said in the presence of youth. (And really should not have been said at all!)
evmori wrote:If Troop have committee meetings behind closed doors & never allow anyone besides the committee members to attend, there is something wrong.
hacimsaalk wrote:why does it matter whether the parents have background checks or not?? are you afraid of you scouts parents?? they arent dealing with scouts, they are dealing with the adults that run the troop.
hacimsaalk wrote:what is discussed that shouldnt/couldnt be heard by an older scout or an SPL?? keeping a secret has nothing to do with it it has everything to with with trust positions and getting kicked out if confidentiality isnt kept.
why does it matter whether the parents have background checks or not?? are you afraid of you scouts parents?? they arent dealing with scouts, they are dealing with the adults that run the troop.
I personal information is discussed duing a committee meeting this information should not be shared with someone who has a questionable background. I am "afraid" of the wrong person using this information for the wrong information.
evmori wrote:
If a parent who isn't registered in the Troop wants to attend a committee meeting they don't need a background check regardless of what is being discussed. If you want to discuss something you feel isn't for non-Troop ears, ask the non-Troop members to leave explaining why you are asking.
Background checks for non-Troop member are not necessary.
ASM-142 wrote:hacimsaalk wrote:why does it matter whether the parents have background checks or not?? are you afraid of you scouts parents?? they arent dealing with scouts, they are dealing with the adults that run the troop.
I personal information is discussed duing a committee meeting this information should not be shared with someone who has a questionable background. I am "afraid" of the wrong person using this information for the wrong information.hacimsaalk wrote:what is discussed that shouldnt/couldnt be heard by an older scout or an SPL?? keeping a secret has nothing to do with it it has everything to with with trust positions and getting kicked out if confidentiality isnt kept.
I would not (and should not) allow a scout (even the SPL) to know the financial information about any other scout or family; personal problems, etc.
Mrw wrote:evmori wrote:
If a parent who isn't registered in the Troop wants to attend a committee meeting they don't need a background check regardless of what is being discussed. If you want to discuss something you feel isn't for non-Troop ears, ask the non-Troop members to leave explaining why you are asking.
Background checks for non-Troop member are not necessary.
Well said.
evmori wrote:If a parent who isn't registered in the Troop wants to attend a committee meeting they don't need a background check regardless of what is being discussed. If you want to discuss something you feel isn't for non-Troop ears, ask the non-Troop members to leave explaining why you are asking.
evmori wrote:Background checks for non-Troop member are not necessary.
ASM-142 wrote:evmori wrote:If a parent who isn't registered in the Troop wants to attend a committee meeting they don't need a background check regardless of what is being discussed. If you want to discuss something you feel isn't for non-Troop ears, ask the non-Troop members to leave explaining why you are asking.
This is why I suggested having public and closed sessions.evmori wrote:Background checks for non-Troop member are not necessary.
I agree. However, only troop members should be permitted in a closed sesson.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests