Moderators: Site Admin, Moderators
Many times, these board posting will tell you wrong is wrong (easy to preach), (and a good number of people told me not to make waves), but it also requires corrective action on your part (the hard part). The scout law teaches to work within the system and to approach the leadership when a wrong is not being corrected.
Cowboy wrote:I spoke with the CAC. He did some "digging" and determined that this has been the case in our District for many years, long before he came on the scene. Our Council does not have a problem with this "requirement", so it will remain in place for now. I told him that I will back that position (no sense taking on city hall when my son is working so hard). I also plan to make the next two Eagle prospects aware of this "requirement". The CAC cautioned me that my son should be doing everything, and that my continued involvement could cause his project to be declared void. I did explain to him that I was not meddling in the project, but instead: "I am dealing with a procedural issue that concerns all Scouts in the District. It was brought to MY attention because of my sons project". This is not strictly about my son, it is about procedure.
cballman wrote: Our troop has had to change the ways of our Star and Life service projects because of this. We had been doing it our way for many years and a couple of people went to the Council and wanted to know what was going on. We changed to fit with the National standreds and really pissed the people off that called because it made their kids have to work harder and learn less.
Really?? This part of the "digging" from DAC to CAC.smtroop168 wrote:Our Council does not have a problem with this "requirement", so it will remain in place for now.
Please, please only back the "correct" procedures. See my prior post this is the hard part. Wrong is wrong. You are fixing this for all the scouts AFTER your son.smtroop168 wrote:I told him that I will back that position (no sense taking on city hall when my son is working so hard).
This is the one I love the most.smtroop168 wrote:The CAC cautioned me that my son should be doing everything, and that my continued involvement could cause his project to be declared void.
Please, please send me this spineless weasel's name and number, and your SE name and number. I volunteer to personally chew this guy a new one. He just messed with a youth's advancement. 30+ years, Silver Whatever, do not care!! Wrong is Wrong.
Scouts cannot start their Eagle projects before they make Life because the Leadership project is a culmination of the scouting leadership skills and service projects they learn on along the trail.Cowboy wrote:That is true as far as it goes, but based on that I wonder why they insist a boy be Life before he does his project. It shouldn't matter when he does the work as long as he does it right?
Cowboy wrote:The Council AC questioned why the big rush for him to make Eagle since he is only 14.5 yrs old.
Ahh. All deepens on your point of view. I suppose if it's OK to make up a rule allowing a 1st Class or Star Scout work on an Eagle project, it ought to be OK to make up fundraising rules too.Cowboy wrote: ... I wonder why they insist a boy be Life before he does his project. It shouldn't matter when he does the work as long as he does it right?
Cowboy wrote:Don't get me wrong, I do not intend to completely drop this issue. I have learned that a lot of BSA (sadly, very sadly) is politics. Having spent many years involved in politics my wife and I have learned the games that must be played. One of those lessons is to know when to set the ball down and wait in the weeds. That is what we are doing. Right now our son is working hard to complete his Eagle project, and pursuing this matter would make things more difficult for him. Once he has completed his ERBoR, we will then pick this back up and try to get things straightened out. We have been very careful and supportive of him during the process and will continue to be so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests