by Scouting179 » Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:51 pm
Lynda J:
My first question is: Why does this "eagle scout dad" thinks he can run the BORs his way in the first place? He is obviously not the Committee Chairman. Is he the Advancement Chairman? If he is an SM, ASM, or parent of a candiadate at a BOR, he isn't even supposed to be on the BOR. If he is a comittee member, he can be on the BOR, but he obviously needs to study up on what a BOR is all about. You are absolutely right in that it is a review and not a retest. Did the BOR chair try to control him?
Turning down a Scout for any rank is appealeable and the scout is to be informed right away of his deficiency(ies), what to do to fix them, a time frame to fix them, and followed up with a written letter. Generally, appeals are only made in the cases of Eagle Rank and Eagle Palms. Turning down a Scout should not be taken lightly. If these BORs were appealed, every one would probably win. BORs should see where the Scout is headed, his goals, and ensure that he did everything he was supposed to (like did he actually do his troop job or did some well meaning ASM just sign it off without checking, etc).
For our troop, I have some binders with sample questions and guidelines for each rank that I use for new BOR members.