Moderators: Site Admin, Moderators
FrankJ wrote:I heard they pulled it back. Something about tandems.![]()
smtroop168 wrote:Here's a question for all though....should the WB be available online ONLY?
Reasonable Rascal wrote:smtroop168 wrote:Here's a question for all though....should the WB be available online ONLY?
.... Online-only access would be a serious impediment to the usefulness of the APP book if the workbook could not be accessed without passing the task off to whomever had a computer (and printer).
RWSmith wrote:Reasonable Rascal wrote:smtroop168 wrote:Here's a question for all though....should the WB be available online ONLY?
.... Online-only access would be a serious impediment to the usefulness of the APP book if the workbook could not be accessed without passing the task off to whomever had a computer (and printer).
Matt,
Here's my angle on the [ESLSP] WB...
As RR noted, not everybody has access to da' net. However, I split these two pubs into two distinct categories, like so:The ACP is written for specifically for use by Scouters (a.k.a., the "adults"). Therefore, I see no problem with National publishing the new ACP via soft copy only. Adults can be reasonably be expected to find the means to print a hard copy, should s/he wish to do so.
OTOH, the ESLSP WB is written for specifically for use by Scouts (a.k.a., the "youth"). Therefore, if you think about it... in order to truly comply with advancement policy, the WB must be made available in printed form to ALL SCOUTS, equally. While an electronic version is certainly helpful, it cannot be required because not ALL Scouts can be expected to find the means to convert a soft copy into printed form.
Bill Pitcher wrote:Can't wait to see it, Matt. Thanks for all of your hard work. Let's face it, every school has a computer lab, so a Scout can print a copy of the WB and fill it in the "old way!"
Fred Johnson wrote:
PS - How long before 2011 ACPP is available?
I find this interesting...when the WB was only available in printed form, folks complained because they wanted the BSA to get into the current world and have an electronic version so it would be easier for the scouts to edit and save their work. The BSA was also able to make changes to the online versions much quicker. Same goes for the Eagle Application. The current electronic version is not very good as we know but his one will be much much better.
FrankJ wrote:One problem with all electronic versions is controlling the the revision process & knowing which version is current and what changed.
FrankJ wrote:Councils will still have the option of printing out the workbook for units or individuals without the resources to do it for themselves. As a budget number for somebody with an office printer, 20 pages at 10 cents a page is only $2.00. Probably better than having centralized printing and the associated overhead. For those that have the resources doing the entire write up electronically has a lot of advantages.
FrankJ wrote:Speaking of a bad way for online documentation: The "official" G2SS is a bunch of web pages that seem to change randomly. The current one seem to align fairly well with the printed version, but it has only been 3 months since the printed version was issued. This is where you really need the change control police.
FrankJ wrote:Speaking of a bad way for online documentation: The "official" G2SS is a bunch of web pages that seem to change randomly. The current one seem to align fairly well with the printed version, but it has only been 3 months since the printed version was issued. This is where you really need the change control police.
Just checking...So you would support having the WB only available online but having councils print them off on demand.
FrankJ wrote:Maybe BSA could partner with somebody like Kinkos. They could print the low usage committee handbooks or even merit badge books on demand. Maybe even make them available on something like a kindle.
Bill Pitcher wrote:Let's face it, every school has a computer lab, so a Scout can print a copy of the WB and fill it in the "old way!"
Return to General Advancement Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests