Here we go, again...

Dewey,
Just what,
exactly, do you mean by a
'zero tolerance offense'? Where is it written in Scouting policy, of any kind, that drug abuse is a
'zero tolerance offense'? What are you saying? That a 14-y/o kid should be banned from Scouting, for life, because he got caught using any of the following: --A prescription medication, which was not prescribed to him? --Over- or under-dosing a prescription medication, which was prescribed to him? --Any illegal drug, which in the case of his age, would include tobacco and/or alcohol? (Nothing on this planet is more addictive
or deadly than pure nicotine.)
I agree, a kid (or adult) who is outside the bounds of whatever he's been prescribed, could present a safety issue that may need to be dealt with immediately, depending upon the 'drug' and circumstances. A Scout or Scouter who so much as has alcohol in his possession needs to be removed from the Scouting activity, immediately; the incident needs to be addressed. But, Zero Tolerance? To, me, that means no second chance. For an adult,
who knew better, I'm all for it. But, for a kid? Please. You know, if we banned Scouts every time they screwed up, then who would we have left in Scouting? Just a bunch of self-righteous Scouters.
I'm not trying to say that you are being self-righteous. What I am trying to say, though, is that I am very much reformed about the phrase "Zero Tolerance", which stemmed from my experience with my kids getting bullied in middle school and the school administration's way of using "Zero Tolerance". Search this board for other discussions regarding 'zero tolerance' and you'll see what I mean. Looking forward to your reply.