Does your troop follow the zero tolerance policy?

Administering the troop, solving problems, building on success, and using key program elements like the Patrol Method.

Moderators: Site Admin, Moderators

Postby Guneukitschik » Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:17 pm

Sounds like the older boys in your troop learned a valuable lesson....well the fact is that all the boys in Troops all over are learning these same lessons! This is all part of Scouting!
Guneukitschik
 

Postby BM_Crawford » Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:13 pm

The bottom line is hazing is not only against bsa policy but its against the law in most places.

(That statement wasnt meant to be offensive I know it sounds a bit.)
Brian Crawford
ASM of Troop 251
District MBC
BM_Crawford
Eagle
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: PA Bushy Run District

Postby evmori » Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:57 am

BM_Crawford wrote:The bottom line is hazing is not only against bsa policy but its against the law in most places.

(That statement wasnt meant to be offensive I know it sounds a bit.)


No offense taken. What you posted is fact. But if smoke shifter hunts are considered hazing then we are going to extremes in the definition.
Ed Mori
1 Peter 4:10
evmori
Gold Palm
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: Greater Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA

Postby optimist » Wed Sep 01, 2004 9:03 am

Just a precautionary post. dparker is correct in saying this thread needs to settle down a lot. I'll leave it open for now but with the expectation that discussion will continue in a calmer manner.
optimist
Adv Chair
 
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: Atlanta Area Council

Postby scoutmasterbob » Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:21 am

You are correct optimist, I apologize for my behavior and my personel attacks towards evmori.

It is an emotional issue and my emotions got the better of me.

As a counselor I should have known better.

Please accept my apology.
Bob Torkelson
Scoutmaster Troop 538
www.wx5troop538.homestead.com
Roundtable Staff since 1994
Eagle-1983
Woodsbadge-2000
Fox Patrol
Live The Oath!
scoutmasterbob
Star
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:19 am
Location: Woods Cross, Utah

Postby dparker » Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:51 am

Ok, maybe we need to see if we can agree on a definition for hazing. Optmist has already given a definition of it. It has a pretty bad connotation. Let's check it's denotation. On m-w.com (Merriam-Webster), it is defined as:
the action of hazing; especially : an initiation process involving harassment.

The verb form is thus defined:
1 a : to harass by exacting unnecessary or disagreeable work b : to harass by banter, ridicule, or criticism. 2 : to haze by way of initiation
If I read 1a right, it would seem that the smoke shifter activity is "unnecessary work", right? Whether it is "harassing" is not totally clear.

Per dictionary.com, hazing definition #2 is:
1. To persecute or harass with meaningless, difficult, or humiliating tasks.
By this definition, it would seem that the smoke shifter activity is hazing. Maybe I am totally misreading the definition though. Per the Guide to Safe Scouting passage quoted earlier by Optimist, I am not sure if we can call the Smokeshifter hazing.

Another point that deserves some discussion is the goal of the Smokeshifter activity. I would assume it is to have fun or to laugh or something along those lines (correct me if I am wrong)? What makes it funny to the boys that know? Why are they laughing? I would really like to hear a response to these questions as they may change my mind or confirm what I was thinking before.
David Parker
Committee Member, Troop 92
Toloma Lodge 64
dparker
Star
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 6:15 pm
Location: Atwater, CA

Previous

Return to Troop Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests